Option Probability Theory: A Quest for Better Measures
Abstract
Most test takers do sometimes guess when responding to multiple-choice questions. Different theories and models attempt to address this issue in different ways. It is argued that test takers seldom randomly guess; they rather eliminate one or more options based on partial knowledge. Option Probability Theory (OPT) deals with guessing as a personal interaction parameter through requiring test takers to indicate how sure they are about each option as being the correct answer. Through calculating a realism index an indication can be obtained about how realistic a test taker has assigned these probabilities and as such serves as an indicator of the amount of guessing and certainty of answers. A small study suggests that OPT results are comparable to traditional results, but with significantly more information about test takers’ knowledge and understanding. Practitioners can use this additional information to identify misconceptions, where there is uncertainty about answers and where guessing can be suspected. Using the realism index, a diagnostic analysis of response patterns can be made and detailed feedback can be given to test takers.
Full Text: PDF DOI: 10.15640/arms.v3n1a7
Abstract
Most test takers do sometimes guess when responding to multiple-choice questions. Different theories and models attempt to address this issue in different ways. It is argued that test takers seldom randomly guess; they rather eliminate one or more options based on partial knowledge. Option Probability Theory (OPT) deals with guessing as a personal interaction parameter through requiring test takers to indicate how sure they are about each option as being the correct answer. Through calculating a realism index an indication can be obtained about how realistic a test taker has assigned these probabilities and as such serves as an indicator of the amount of guessing and certainty of answers. A small study suggests that OPT results are comparable to traditional results, but with significantly more information about test takers’ knowledge and understanding. Practitioners can use this additional information to identify misconceptions, where there is uncertainty about answers and where guessing can be suspected. Using the realism index, a diagnostic analysis of response patterns can be made and detailed feedback can be given to test takers.
Full Text: PDF DOI: 10.15640/arms.v3n1a7
Browse Journals
Journal Policies
Information
Useful Links
- Call for Papers
- Submit Your Paper
- Publish in Your Native Language
- Subscribe the Journal
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Contact the Executive Editor
- Recommend this Journal to Librarian
- View the Current Issue
- View the Previous Issues
- Recommend this Journal to Friends
- Recommend a Special Issue
- Comment on the Journal
- Publish the Conference Proceedings
Latest Activities
Resources
Visiting Status
![]() |
232 |
![]() |
440 |
![]() |
821 |
![]() |
6335 |
![]() |
1048920 |
![]() |
11 |